Supreme Court Rules Much of Oklahoma Belongs to Indian Reservation

The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that much of Oklahoma belongs to Native American tribes in a huge victory for a reservation that challenged the state’s authority to prosecute crimes on its land.

In the 5-4 decision, the majority ruled that the disputed area covering approximately half of the state and most of the city of Tulsa belongs to the Muscogee (Creek) Nation.

“Today we are asked whether the land promised by these treaties remains an Indian reservation for the purposes of federal criminal law,” the judge said. Neil GorsuchNeil GorsuchSenate GOP faces uncharted waters in Supreme Court fight Overthrowing Roe isn’t just about red states or abortion Biden’s Supreme Court pick: A political promise, but also a matter of justice MORE, a Trump appointee, wrote for the majority. “Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word.”

The decision could overturn state authority over much of the territory and prevent it from prosecuting tribal members accused of crimes on the reservation. Oklahoma may no longer be able to tax those residing on Creek land.

Gorsuch was joined in the majority by the four justices from the court’s liberal wing: Stephane BreyerStephen BreyerJudiciary Chairman Says ‘Multiple’ Republicans May Be Open To Biden’s Supreme Court Pick On The Money – How Breyer Is Bailing Out The Blocks To Build Back Better, Ruth Bader GinsburgRuth Bader GinsburgRetirement of Justice Breyer shows Biden’s limited ability to reshape Supreme Court Senate GOP faces uncharted waters in Supreme Court fight Senators preview upcoming battle for nomination Supreme Court MORE, Elena KaganElena Kagan With Breyer out, all SCOTUS progressives will be women The Hill’s Morning Report – What’s Putin’s Next Move? What does it mean to have a Supreme Court that “looks like America”? FOLLOWING and Sonia SotomayorSonia SotomayorWith Breyer out, all SCOTUS progressives will be women The Hill’s Morning Report – What’s Putin’s Next Move? What does it mean to have a Supreme Court that “looks like America”? FOLLOWING. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote a dissent, which was joined by the justices Samuel AlitoSamuel AlitoWhat does it mean to have a Supreme Court that “looks like America”? Overthrowing Roe isn’t just about red states or abortion Will the judges end race-based affirmative action? FOLLOWING, Brett KavanaughBrett Michael KavanaughWith the release of Breyer, all SCOTUS progressives will be women. FOLLOWING and Clarence ThomasClarence ThomasWith Breyer out, all SCOTUS progressives will be women Justice Breyer’s retirement shows Biden’s limited ability to reshape the Supreme Court What does it mean to have a Supreme Court that ‘looks like America’? FOLLOWING.

“Today’s decision creates significant uncertainty for the state’s continued authority over any area that affects Indian affairs, ranging from zoning and taxation to family and environmental law,” he said. writes Roberts in his dissent. “None of this is justified.”

The Creek Tribe released a statement Thursday welcoming the decision.

“The Supreme Court today fulfilled the sacred promise of the United States to the Muscogee (Creek) Nation of a protected reservation,” the statement read. “Today’s decision will allow the nation to honor our ancestors by maintaining our established sovereignty and territorial boundaries. We will continue to work with federal and state law enforcement agencies to ensure that public safety is maintained within all territorial limits of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation.”

The case involves Jimcy McGirt, a convicted rapist serving a thousand years in addition to a life sentence, who challenged his conviction on the grounds that the crime took place in Creek territory.

McGirt could now face a new trial in federal court.

Oklahoma, which was backed in the case by the Trump administration, argued that the disputed territory with the Creek had never been a reservation, and even if it had been, it had been dissolved there. a long time ago.

But Gorsuch wrote for the majority that it takes an act of Congress to dissolve a reservation and there is no evidence that he did so with Creek lands.

“Assembling the broad social consensus required to pass new legislation is a deliberately difficult task under our Constitution. Faced with this daunting task, Congress might at times wish that a troublesome reservation would simply go away,” Gorsuch wrote. “But wishes don’t make laws, and sparing political branches the embarrassment of removing a reservation is not part of our constitutional prerogatives.”

Oklahoma said in a joint statement Thursday with the Creek, Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw and Seminole Nations that they would submit a proposal to Congress to resolve open jurisdictional issues.

“The Nations and the State are pledged to ensure that Jimcy McGirt, patrick murphyPatrick Erin MurphyFormer Cambodian Prime Minister Norodom Ranariddh dies at 77 US condemns imprisonment of Cambodian teenager over social media posts MOREand all other offenders face justice for the crimes for which they are charged,” they said. “We have a shared commitment to maintaining public safety and long-term economic prosperity for the Nations and Oklahoma.

“The Nations and the State are committed to implementing a framework of shared jurisdiction that will preserve sovereign interests and rights of self-government while affirming jurisdictional arrangements, procedures, laws and regulations that support the public safety, our economy and private property rights,” they continued. “We will continue our work, confident that we can achieve more together than any of us could alone.”

Updated at 12:55 p.m.

Nohemi M. Moore